Unnecessary Sequels That Made Us Scream ‘Why?!’ – 16 Movies That Should Have Stayed Unmade

Entertainment Movie & Music
Unnecessary Sequels That Made Us Scream ‘Why?!’ – 16 Movies That Should Have Stayed Unmade

Hey movie buffs! Get ready to dive into one of Hollywood’s strangest trends: the totally uncalled-for movie sequel. You know how it goes, right? A film is a hit, rakes in cash, and suddenly, studios prioritize profit over a well-concluded story, leading to sequels nobody genuinely wanted.

It’s almost like Benjamin Franklin himself, if he were around today, would update his famous quote to include: “Nothing is certain but death and taxes. And that most movies, if they make a reasonable profit, will get sequels whether they need one or not.” Anachronistic Ben Franklin really hit the nail on the head! Hefty profits can magically transform the most standalone and self-contained movies into a trilogy, tetralogy, or something even worse. We’ve all been there, sitting in the theater (or, more likely, on our couches) watching a sequel unfold and thinking, “Was this really necessary?” Sometimes, the answer is a resounding, head-shaking NO.

So, settle in, because we’re about to highlight 16 sequels that were, let’s be honest, completely unnecessary. Some were clearly made for shareholders, not because audiences were begging for them. Others were just so remarkably bad, they arguably shouldn’t exist at all. Prepare to agree with us as we explore films where things went downhill, sparking a series of pointless follow-ups and eroding audience trust.

The Blues Brothers 1980,IMDB Rating: 7.9, IMDB Votes: 216421, ID: 0080455
Photo by blogspot.com, is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0

1. Blues Brothers 2000

Picture this: a classic, beloved movie with iconic music, humor, and chemistry. Now, imagine a sequel made nearly two decades later, with one of the main stars tragically gone. “Blues Brothers 2000” felt like a bold, perhaps misguided, cinematic move, and the story goes that if you’re ever near Abel Hill Cemetery in Chilmark, Massachusetts, you might just hear John Belushi’s spirit groaning in protest. This sequel truly missed the mark.

Freshly released from prison, Elwood Blues (Dan Aykroyd) has to reunite with his old band members to raise enough funds for Sister Mary Stigmata. Sound familiar? That’s because it’s essentially a beat-for-beat copy of the original, but one so pale as to be virtually transparent. On their journey, they’re pursued by the police, a white supremacist group, the Russian mafia, and more. It tries to replicate the magic, but it just doesn’t land.

John Goodman, bless his heart, does his best to fill some very large shoes, but even he can’t compete against the one element single-handedly guaranteed to ruin any movie (except maybe “Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom”): a wisecracking kid sidekick. The film’s only real claim to fame? Crashing more cars than the original, a piece of trivia that’s ironically perfect for this cinematic car crash of a movie.

The Matrix: Reloaded & Revolutions
Download Movie The Matrix Image, Photo by alphacoders.com, is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0

2. The Matrix: Reloaded & Revolutions

Now, let’s get one thing straight: the “Matrix” sequels are undeniably fun, entertaining movies with some seriously memorable set pieces. Nobody’s denying the cool factor of those bullet-time stunts or epic freeway chases. But here’s the kicker, and it’s a big one: they are just so utterly unnecessary. Think back to the end of the original “The Matrix.” Neo is basically a god. He’s got all the cheat codes, he sees the Matrix for what it truly is – a decipherable construct of code – and he can manipulate it at will. He defeats Agent Smith with ease, promises the machines their end is nigh, and then, with a glorious flight, cue Rage Against the Machine and the end credits. Victory. Assumed. Perfect!

So, if Neo is the One, effectively a god who can crack the Matrix wide open, why in the digital world did we need both “Reloaded” and “Revolutions”? The original “Matrix” is a perfectly formed standalone film, a self-contained masterpiece that captivated audiences worldwide. Sure, the Wachowskis might have had an eye towards a trilogy from the start, but nobody could have predicted how monumentally popular that first movie would become. Its runaway success, in many ways, thrust these unnecessary sequels upon us.

While “The Matrix Reloaded” offered some decent action, it began diluting the original’s unique premise by overemphasizing the ‘chosen one’ narrative. As for “The Matrix Revolutions”? Well, unless you’re a die-hard fan of robot battles above all else, it felt like a profound philosophical exploration lost amidst excessive CGI and a muddled plot.

man wearing shoulder pads
Photo by Ivan Stern on Unsplash

3. Highlander II: The Quickening

Some movie mysteries are truly best left untouched. Seriously, we didn’t need to know why Bill Murray was trapped in a time loop in “Groundhog Day,” and the Xenomorph from “Alien” has only gotten less terrifying with Ridley Scott’s repeated attempts to explain its background. And perhaps the most glaring example of a mystery nobody – and we mean nobody – was crying out for an origin story for? The immortals in “Highlander.”

The 1986 original was a blast! A fun, throwaway action film with an excellent soundtrack, a neat bit of self-contained mythology (people find they’re immortal at the point of death, decapitate another and gain their powers), and a whole lot of Christopher Lambert and Clancy Brown scrapping on rooftops with neon lights and clanging swords. It was simple, it was cool, and it worked.

Then came “Highlander II: The Quickening.” Returning director Russell Mulcahy, for reasons known only to the immortals themselves, decided to throw unnecessary backstory into a convoluted mess of a plot that only an immortal would have the time (or patience) to understand. Suddenly, our Highlander heroes and villains weren’t just living forever; they were also from outer space! While it’s true that Michael Ironside improves any movie he’s in by at least 60%, even his undeniable presence couldn’t save this bewildering addition to the legend. It took a perfectly good, simple idea and tied it in so many knots that it became unrecognizable.

American Psycho II: All American Girl 2002,IMDB Rating: 3.7, IMDB Votes: 18121, ID: 0283877
Photo by bp.blogspot.com, is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0

4. American Psycho 2: All-American Girl

Oh, where do we even begin with “American Psycho 2: All-American Girl”? The original “American Psycho” is a sharp, witty satire of 1980s excess, a chilling look at how everything, including human life, gets devalued and commoditized by the wealthy. It’s smart, it’s disturbing, and it’s brilliant. Its 2002 sequel, however, is a different beast entirely. It’s 88 minutes that you will genuinely never get back, and according to the context, it will make you long for the cold, blessed relief of death. Yikes!

Here’s the real kicker: this Mila Kunis-starring sequel wasn’t even written as a follow-up to “American Psycho.” The story, which revolves around an ambitious criminology student willing to kill for continued success, only had its tenuous links to the original added after the first movie’s success. Even Kunis herself, who has since proven her immense talent far beyond this shoddy material, reportedly thought it was a different project until it was edited and released. Imagine that surprise!

Patrick Bateman, the titular American Psycho, only appears in the film’s introduction, and it’s a poor body double filmed from behind. So, the star of the original is barely a footnote here! Not even the appearance of William Shatner, who seems to be thoroughly enjoying himself in his role, can redeem this cinematic atrocity. It’s a textbook example of a studio slapping a recognizable name onto an unrelated project, hoping for a quick buck, and instead delivering a completely forgettable and frankly, offensive, experience.

5. Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines

Ever wish that *he* wouldn’t be back? Just once? Sadly, much like the relentless Skynet itself, the Terminator franchise has proven to be a behemoth that seems impossible to truly wipe out. “Terminator 2: Judgment Day” was a masterpiece; it never felt like a cheap cash-in, but rather a more than worthy sequel to the 1985 original, neatly continuing and concluding the tale of Sarah Connor versus the machines. It was epic, emotional, and satisfying. The story felt *done*.

“Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines,” however, screams “cynical excuse to prolong a story that had effectively already ended.” With Edward Furlong wisely not returning to reprise his role, “Terminator 3” sees John Connor and his girlfriend pursued by yet another unstoppable Skynet agent. Sound familiar? It’s another chase movie, but one that sadly lacks the style or intelligence of its two predecessors.

Honestly, only a slightly novel ending saves “Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines” from being just another generic action flick. And let’s face it, “Terminator Salvation” could have easily taken its place, leaving audiences bewildered and questioning Skynet’s ultimate goals. The sheer volume of Terminator films since the second one suggests that as long as Skynet has time travel tech, studios will keep churning them out, regardless of our actual desire for them.

Grease 2
Grease 2, Photo by lifeiswisdom.com, is licensed under CC BY-ND 4.0

6. Grease 2

Alright, let’s talk “Grease.” There was this fascinating fan theory circulating around the time of the original movie’s 40th anniversary, suggesting that Sandy (Olivia Newton-John) was actually dying the whole movie – she drowned that summer night with Danny, and the entire film is a coma hallucination. When Greased Lightning (automatic, systematic, and hydromatic, incidentally!) ascends to the heavens with Sandy riding shotgun, it’s her spirit passing on. Given the existence of “Grease 2,” I’m honestly inclined to believe that rather theistic take on the classic. Why? Because “Grease 2” feels less like a sequel and more like some kind of hell, or at least an awfully specific flavor of purgatory.

It transports us to a dreadful limbo realm where actors in their mid-20s and early 30s pretend to be teenagers, singing awful, unmemorable songs, all while sporting ’80s hair and fashions, even though they’re supposedly pretending it’s the ’50s. The clash of eras, the cringeworthy musical numbers, and the palpable lack of charm make it a truly bewildering experience. It’s a blatant retread of the first film, but with even fewer stakes and none of the undeniable charisma that made the original a timeless hit.

Seriously, this is not the one that anyone wanted, ooh, ooh, ooh, honey. It’s a pale imitation that proves some stories are best left as a singular, iconic moment in time. Trying to recapture lightning in a bottle, especially when the bottle is already full of amazing singing and dancing, rarely works. In this case, it spectacularly failed, leaving us all wondering why we ever went back to Rydell High without Danny and Sandy leading the way.

7. Book of Shadows: Blair Witch 2

“The Blair Witch Project” was a game-changer. It terrified audiences with its novel use of the found-footage format and its brilliantly nebulous, unsettling backstory, making us believe that what we were seeing was real. It was a cultural phenomenon. Then, a mere year later, came “Book of Shadows: Blair Witch 2.” It was clearly rushed to theaters, a blatant attempt to exploit the intense hype that the original movie was still generating. And in doing so, it eschewed everything that made the first film memorable.

Instead of the chilling subtlety and implied horror, “Blair Witch 2” felt like a completely different movie, abandoning the found-footage gimmick and the mysterious allure of the original. The context states it’s not a terrible film, but it’s certainly not a great one either. It just feels… wasted. The original premise was completely squandered in this meandering, formulaic effort, and that’s a genuine shame. It was like nobody even tried to live up to the standard set by its predecessor.

Admittedly, following the phenomenal success of “The Blair Witch Project” would have been an incredibly difficult task for any sequel. But this movie just took the easy way out. If it weren’t for the “Blair Witch” moniker in the title, you’d be completely forgiven for mistaking this for one of a million identical horror films – specifically, one that randomly cannibalizes elements from a handful of better movies. It’s a classic case of striking while the iron is hot, but completely missing the mark on what made the iron hot in the first place.

Son of the Mask 2005,IMDB Rating: 2.3, IMDB Votes: 59716, ID: 0362165
Photo by wikimedia.org, is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0

8. Son of the Mask

Remember 1994’s “The Mask”? It was an above-average comic book adaptation elevated to sheer excellence by Cameron Diaz’s big debut and Jim Carrey’s absolutely unhinged, over-the-top performance. He was a live-action Tex Avery cartoon, leaving no piece of scenery unchewed, conjuring up memories of Michael Keaton’s excellent portrayal of Beetlejuice. It was vibrant, hilarious, and just plain *fun*. Now, try to remember “Son of the Mask”… yeah, thought so.

“Son of the Mask” is the exact opposite. It’s a lackluster movie that replaces a coherent plot and characterization with an endless barrage of underwhelming CGI. It’s like someone decided that more computer effects automatically equaled more fun, forgetting that Jim Carrey’s physical comedy and the cartoonish charm were the real magic. Instead of innovative visual gags, we got a barrage of effects that felt more irritating than inspiring.

It’s a real puzzle who “Son of the Mask” was even intended for. It lacks the wit for adults and is too crude and confusing for children. Seriously, Alan Cumming and Bob Hoskins deserved so much better than this chaotic cinematic experience. It’s described perfectly as a bizarre fever dream – you’ll be relieved when it’s over, and you’ll question if it even happened, but sadly, it was all too real and utterly unnecessary.

As we continue our deep dive into Hollywood’s most questionable decisions, we’re exposing more sequels that left us collectively bewildered. Prepare for more cringeworthy moments, laughter, and perhaps a touch of sadness for what could have been. We have eight more cinematic blunders to examine, each highlighting the sheer nerve of studios greenlighting projects nobody asked for, often at the expense of beloved franchises.

Jaws: The Revenge 1987,IMDB Rating: 3.0, IMDB Votes: 50207, ID: 0093300
Photo by wikimedia.org, is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0

9. Jaws: The Revenge

Alright, buckle up, because this one’s a real head-scratcher. Michael Caine, bless his legendary soul, famously explained his participation in “Jaws: The Revenge” with a classic line: “I have never seen it, but by all accounts, it is terrible. However, I have seen the house that it built, and it is terrific!” And honestly, that quote might be the most memorable thing about this entire film. It’s hard to argue with a man who prioritized building a fantastic home, even if it meant starring in a movie where a shark seeks revenge.

But seriously, let’s unpack the sheer lunacy. Are we, the audience, really expected to believe that a shark has the mental capacity to seek revenge for another dead shark? The context hilariously questions how this super-shark managed to swim 1,250 miles from Amity Island to the Bahamas in less than three days. Forget logical plot progression; this film threw it overboard the second it decided a shark could hold a grudge.

And it gets even better (or worse, depending on your perspective). This revenge-seeking aquatic monster can *roar*. Underwater! This movie literally achieved a 0% on Rotten Tomatoes, a feat that speaks volumes about its quality, or rather, lack thereof. It’s truly a globetrotting shark stalking a now ‘shark-psychic’ Ellen Brody for a final, underwhelming showdown. We’re still wondering if it was worth it, Michael.

Exorcist II: The Heretic 1977,IMDB Rating: 3.8, IMDB Votes: 28723, ID: 0076009
Photo by images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com, is licensed under CC BY ND 4.0

10. Exorcist 2: The Heretic

When a Leslie Nielsen comedy from 1990, “Repossessed,” is considered both a better movie and a more serious sequel to “The Exorcist,” you know something has gone terribly, terribly wrong. “The Exorcist” is a landmark horror film, genuinely terrifying and thought-provoking. Its sequel, “Exorcist 2: The Heretic,” however, veers so wildly off course that it barely feels like it belongs in the same genre, let alone the same franchise.

Richard Burton, an actor of immense talent, stars as Father Lamont, an experienced priest on a quest to uncover the truth about the demon Pazuzu. While the original’s writer and director were notably absent, John Boorman, known for “Deliverance” and “Excalibur,” took the helm. The film even boasted a stellar cast and a soundtrack by the legendary Ennio Morricone. So, on paper, it had potential, right?

Wrong. So, incredibly wrong. The context bluntly states that “Exorcist 2” is often “so dull and incomprehensible” that it barely registers as a horror film. It completely misses the chilling, psychological dread of its predecessor, opting instead for a meandering plot that alienates rather than engages. Seriously, the power of Christ compels you to avoid this turkey at all costs! (Though, we hear “Exorcist 3: Legion” totally makes up for this accursed nonsense, so there’s that!)

11. Return of the Living Dead II

“The Return of the Living Dead” (1985) is an absolute horror-comedy classic, a true gem of the ’80s that perfectly blended gore, laughs, and genuinely iconic zombies. It even had a definitive ending: the military launches a nuclear strike on Louisville to contain the outbreak. Tragically, this meant the survivors perished. Even more tragically, it didn’t destroy any chances of a sequel, leading us directly to “Return of the Living Dead II.”

Attempting to recapture that lightning in a bottle, the filmmakers behind this sequel tried to replicate the magic by recruiting several members of the original cast. They even kept the general premise of a zombie outbreak, albeit changing the setting from a funeral home to a small town. However, the original writer-director, Dan O’Bannon, wisely made the career-saving move of staying clear, and his absence is palpable.

This sequel, on the other hand, is a considerably weaker affair on both counts. It feels clumsy, rushed, and severely lacking in the chemistry that made the original so unique and stand out. Characters like the series-favorite Tarman show up simply because, well, he’s Tarman, not because he serves any real narrative purpose. It’s a textbook example of a sequel that blindly repeats the plot beats of its predecessor without understanding *why* those beats worked in the first place.

Police Academy 4: Citizens on Patrol 1987,IMDB Rating: 5.0, IMDB Votes: 46179, ID: 0093756
Photo by kritiky.cz, is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0

12. Police Academy 4: Citizens on Patrol

You know a franchise is in trouble when you start to suspect the entire writing team was replaced by a Commodore 64 running a random plot generator. We’re talking about “Police Academy 4: Citizens on Patrol,” folks, and while that’s purely speculative, it’s honestly the only logical explanation for how we got this film and its three subsequent sequels. “Police Academy 3: Back in Training” (1986) was already stretching it, but the fourth installment is where the rot *truly* started to set in.

The brilliant “plot” devised by our hypothetical Commodore 64 involves the police commander creating a plan to make everyday citizens work alongside police officers. And naturally, our beloved, hapless bunch of rejects from the Police Academy are the ones picked to spearhead this noble scheme. What could possibly go wrong? Everything, apparently. “Hilarity ostensibly ensues,” the context notes, “although honestly, nothing here is particularly funny.”

This film marked a significant turning point, not just for the franchise’s quality, but also for its cast. Even the venerable Steve Guttenberg, who had been a staple, bailed after this installment. Let that sink in: Steve Guttenberg, who later went on to star in a movie called “Lavalantula,” decided “Police Academy 4” was his limit. When your movie drives away even that level of commitment, you know you’ve created something truly special in the “unnecessary” department.

Batman & Robin
Batman & Robin” by Dave Keeshan is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0

13. Batman & Robin

Forget the Joker, the Riddler, or the Penguin. The true arch-nemesis in Batman’s illustrious rogues’ gallery, according to the context, is none other than director Joel Schumacher. Over the course of just two films, he managed to take a thriving, dark, and Gothic franchise and kill it stone dead. While both Tim Burton and the comics were steering Batman towards a grittier aesthetic, Schumacher was apparently busy buying every single neon light he could get his hands on.

“Batman & Robin” is a masterclass in what *not* to do with a superhero movie. Hollywood hadn’t yet learned that adding more villains generally makes a film worse, so our Caped Crusaders, along with Batgirl, found themselves confronting Mister Freeze, Poison Ivy, *and* Bane. It’s a villain-palooza that completely overwhelms any semblance of plot or character development.

And then there’s George Clooney, who, despite his later acclaim, donned the cowl and managed to be mediocre at portraying both Bruce Wayne and Batman. But perhaps the most enduring (and cringeworthy) aspect of the film is Arnold Schwarzenegger’s Mister Freeze, who single-handedly attempts to shoehorn every possible pun about snow and ice into the movie. Watching “Batman & Robin” thus transforms from a superhero thriller into an “endurance test,” as the context aptly puts it.

Troll 2 1990,IMDB Rating: 3.0, IMDB Votes: 34923, ID: 0105643
Photo by ssl-images-amazon.com, is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0

14. Troll 2

If you’re creating a list of truly dreadful sequels, leaving out “Troll 2” would be an absolute oversight. It’s practically a mandatory inclusion. But here’s the truly astonishing part: “Troll 2” has sunk so far into the realm of ‘bad movies’ that it’s somehow circled back to being celebrated at the top. It’s not just bad; it’s a legendary cinematic event, a masterpiece of unintentional comedy that defies conventional critique.

The context speculates that when humanity eventually vanishes, future travelers might stumble upon a copy of “Troll 2” and consider it one of mankind’s greatest achievements, right up there with mastering flight and inventing the spork. How, they might wonder, with a budget of “twenty-three dollars and two buttons,” a cast of individuals generously referred to as “actors,” and a script that seems to have been written by throwing lines around a room, was such a masterpiece of bizarre cinema created?

It embodies the quintessential ‘so bad it’s good’ phenomenon, to the point where it loops back to being genuinely bad, establishing its own unique category. “Troll 2” is the film that “Plan 9 from Outer Space” aspires to be, bearing no relation to the original “Troll” movie, featuring no actual trolls (only goblins in disguise), and boasting hilariously stilted dialogue. It exists as a stunning, bewildering accident, a sequel that was definitively not requested.

The Hangover Part III 2013,IMDB Rating: 5.8, IMDB Votes: 338202, ID: 1951261
Photo by popkult.blog.hu, is licensed under CC BY-ND 4.0

15. The Hangover Part II & Part III

Oh, “The Hangover.” The first one was a riot, a genuinely hilarious and inventive comedy that delivered exactly what it promised: a wild, blackout night in Vegas with hilarious consequences. It was a smash hit, and naturally, Hollywood decided that meant we needed more. So, we got “The Hangover Part II” and “The Hangover Part III,” sequels that truly cemented the idea that some stories are best left as a one-off adventure.

The question isn’t always “why did this get made?” but sometimes “why do people keep going to see these?” The context nails it: “Part II was exactly the same premise, just in Bangkok.” It was a carbon copy, taking the formula of a missing groom, a crazy night, and a quest to piece together what happened, and transplanting it to a new, exotic locale. The original’s fresh, spontaneous chaos felt engineered and tired the second time around.

By the time “Part III” rolled around, everyone involved seemed to realize the formula wasn’t working. They tried to take it back to Las Vegas to recapture the original’s success, but it was too late. The magic was gone. The context even jokingly suggests a conspiracy theory that “Part III” was funded by the Las Vegas tourism board, which is honestly not that far-fetched given the state of the franchise at that point.

Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull 2008,IMDB Rating: 6.2, IMDB Votes: 494308, ID: 0367882
Photo by cortecs.org, is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0

16. Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull

Ah, Indiana Jones. Harrison Ford’s gritty yet endearing portrayal of Spielberg’s reimagined 1930s action hero is a cornerstone of cinema, always a crowd-pleaser, delivering thrilling adventures, ancient mysteries, and plenty of whip-cracking action. The first three films were iconic, culminating in what felt like a perfect farewell with “Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade.” But alas, as we’ve learned, Hollywood often sees a good ending not as a conclusion, but as an opportunity for another paycheck.

Enter “Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull,” a sequel that many fans would prefer to pretend never happened. After almost two decades, audiences were finally treated to a new Indy adventure, only to find themselves grappling with aliens, refrigerators, and Shia LaBeouf as a greaser swinging through trees with monkeys. The film seemed to discard much of what made the original trilogy so beloved, opting for an increasingly fantastical plot that felt out of place with the established tone.

The context points out that Harrison Ford seems to keep getting “sucked into those reboots!” referring also to “Star Wars: The Force Awakens” and “Blade Runner 2049.” While some of these reboots were well-received, “Crystal Skull” stands out as a particularly egregious example of a beloved franchise returning with a whimper rather than a bang. It sullied the legacy of one of cinema’s greatest adventurers, demonstrating that sometimes, even iconic heroes are better left in the sunset, rather than being dragged back for one more unnecessary outing.

So there you have it, fellow movie lovers, 16 prime examples of cinematic endeavors that, despite their potential and star power, completely missed the mark. From questionable plot choices to recycled stories and jarring tonal shifts, these sequels serve as a potent reminder that sometimes, a story is best left as it is. Let’s hope Hollywood eventually learns to let well-told narratives rest, sparing us the collective question: ‘Was this truly necessary?’ Until then, we’ll be here with our popcorn, ready for the next baffling follow-up. And if you’re bold enough to defend these cinematic missteps, share your unique views with us on Facebook or Twitter!

Leave a Reply

Scroll to top